Welcome to Equal
The 1972 Equal Rights Amendment Page
Welcome to our site where we have collected recent news and resources for 1972 Equal Rights Amendment.
Latest 1972 Equal Rights Amendment News
1972 Equal Rights Amendment
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Equal rights for women is a concept Americans would easily support. But, a constitutional amendment Congressional Democrats have reintroduced to enshrine it is nothing more than a phony attempt to promote abortion ...
Read moreEnter your email address - LifeNews.com
The 2005 jailing of New York Times reporter Judith Miller brought into focus the larger issue of whether the First Amendment protects journalists who refuse to reveal confidential sources. Since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its 1972 decision in ...
Read moreJailed & subpoenaed journalists — a historical timeline - First Amendment Center
A federal appeals court has ordered Southern Illinois University to recognize a Christian group — regardless of the fact that the group’s procedures may violate other anti-bias rules at the campus. The ruling granted an injunction that restored ...
Read moreConflicting Rights - Inside Higher Ed
September 19, 2008 Keywords: Constitution Day, Rutgers, 14th Amendment, Citizenship Day, ex-felons, voting rights, Supreme Court Students and members of the Newark, N.J. community gathered at Rutgers University Newark to celebrate the fourth ...
Read moreRutgers Spends Constitution Day Fighting for Equal Voting Rights - Diversity Inc
The largest exception to the growing inclusion of U.S. public education was African Americans. Before the U.S. Civil War (1861-1865), southern slaves not only had little access to education but could be punished for learning to read. With the end of ...
Read moreEducation for All - Newsblaze.com
Editor’s note: This article was written in 2003. See update below on U.S. Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling in Cutter v. Wilkinson. Today, the First Amendment of the Constitution protects a person’s right to worship freely, but controversy still ...
Read moreZoning religion: the battle over RLUIPA - First Amendment Center
Alan Alda has starred in a hit TV series. He virtually grew up on the stage and has produced, directed and starred in movies. In 2004 and 2005, he earned nominations for an Oscar, an Emmy and a Tony, and his first book climbed the bestseller list. He ...
Read moreAlda's latest turns looking back into a new chapter - Miami Herald
The Republican Party looks at our people and sees a new dawn of the American spirit. The Democratic Party looks at our nation and sees the twilight of the American soul. Republicans affirm that now, as throughout history, the spiritual and ...
Read more1984 Republican Party Platform - CNN
The Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. Angry over the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed new territories to choose slavery, organizers held the party's first organizational meeting in March of that year in ...
Read moreA GOP History - CNN
Abortion, Education, Second Amendment, Embryonic stem cells We Can’t Afford the Democrats’ Platform By Phyllis Schlafy Saturday, September 13, 2008 The past two presidential elections taught the losing Democrats a couple of political lessons ...
Read more1972 Equal Rights Amendment Questions asked
Resolved Question: Which political party has "flip-flopped" the most on the race issue?
* Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it. * Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. * Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws. * Democrats fought to keep blacks in slavery and away from the polls, and they started the Ku Klux Klan to terrorize them. * Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan. * Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage. * Democrats passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans. * Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks. * Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's choice for vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt opposed integration of the armed forces. * Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd were the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. * Democrat public safety commissioner Eugene "Bull" Connor, in Birmingham, Ala., unleashed vicious dogs and turned fire hoses on black civil rights demonstrators. * Democrats were who Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the other protestors were fighting. * Democrat Georgia Governor Lester Maddox "brandished an ax hammer to prevent blacks from patronizing his restaurant. * Democrat Governor George Wallace stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, declaring there would be segregation forever. * Democrat Arkansas Governor Faubus tried to prevent desegregation of Little Rock public schools. * Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act. * Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King. * Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI. * Democrat President Bill Clinton's mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation. * Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67. * Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision. * Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964. * Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Regarding the Republican Party, historians report that while Democrats were busy passing laws to hurt blacks, Republicans devoted their time to passing laws to help blacks. Republicans were primarily responsible for the following Civil Rights legislation: 1. The Emancipation Proclamation 2. The 13th Amendment 3. The 14th Amendment 4. The 15th Amendment 5. The Reconstruction Act of 1867 6. The Civil Rights of 1866 7. The Enforcement Act of 1870 8. The Forced Act of 1871 9. The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 10. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 11. The Freeman Bureau 12. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 13. The Civil Rights Act of 1960 14. The United State Civil Rights Commission And gave strong bi-partisan support and sponsorship for the following legislation 15. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 17. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 18. The 1968 Civil Rights Acts 19. The Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 20. Goals and Timetables for Affirmative Action Programs 21. Comprehensive Employment Training Act of 1973 22. Voting Rights Act of Amendment of 1982 23. Civil Rights Act of 1983 24. Federal Contract Compliance and Workforce Development Act of 1988 moreResolved Question: Why is Obama playing into the hands of the KKK's own party?
The KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party. Our nation's top historians reveal that the Democratic Party gave us the Ku Klux Klan, Black Codes, Jim Crow Laws and other repressive legislation which resulted in the multitude of murders, lynchings, mutilations, and intimidations (of thousands of black and white Republicans). On the issue of slavery: historians say the Democrats gave their lives to expand it, the Republicans gave their lives to ban it. "--The KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party.--" The Democrats * Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it. * Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. * Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws. * Democrats fought to keep blacks in slavery and away from the polls, and they started the Ku Klux Klan to terrorize them. * Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan. * Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage. * Democrats passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans. * Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks. * Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's choice for vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching. * Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt opposed integration of the armed forces. * Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd were the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. * Democrat public safety commissioner Eugene "Bull" Connor, in Birmingham, Ala., unleashed vicious dogs and turned fire hoses on black civil rights demonstrators. * Democrats were who Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the other protestors were fighting. * Democrat Georgia Governor Lester Maddox "brandished an ax hammer to prevent blacks from patronizing his restaurant. * Democrat Governor George Wallace stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, declaring there would be segregation forever. * Democrat Arkansas Governor Faubus tried to prevent desegregation of Little Rock public schools. * Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act. * Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King. * Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI. * Democrat President Bill Clinton's mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation. * Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67. * Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision. * Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964. * Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Regarding the Republican Party, historians report that while Democrats were busy passing laws to hurt blacks, Republicans devoted their time to passing laws to help blacks. Republicans were primarily responsible for the following Civil Rights legislation: 1. The Emancipation Proclamation 2. The 13th Amendment 3. The 14th Amendment 4. The 15th Amendment 5. The Reconstruction Act of 1867 6. The Civil Rights of 1866 7. The Enforcement Act of 1870 8. The Forced Act of 1871 9. The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 10. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 11. The Freeman Bureau 12. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 13. The Civil Rights Act of 1960 14. The United State Civil Rights Commission And gave strong bi-partisan support and sponsorship for the following legislation 15. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 17. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 18. The 1968 Civil Rights Acts 19. The Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 20. Goals and Timetables for Affirmative Action Programs 21. Comprehensive Employment Training Act of 1973 22. Voting Rights Act of Amendment of 1982 23. Civil Rights Act of 1983 24. Federal Contract Compliance and Workforce Development Act of 1988 Programs By Republicans & their Supporters include: a. Many of our key traditional Black Colleges are named after Republicans Colleges b. The Freedman Bureau c. Historians say that three whites that opposed the Democrat's racist practices, including the lynching of blacks, founded and funded the NAACP Dr. Martin Luther King was a Republican because: The Republicans * Republicans enacted civil rights laws in the 1950’s and 1960’s, over the objection of Democrats. * Republicans founded the HCBU’s and started the NAACP to counter the racist practices of the Democrats. * Republicans pushed through much of the ground-breaking civil rights legislation in Congress. * Republicans fought slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom, citizenship and the right to vote. * Republicans pushed through much of the groundbreaking civil rights legislation from the 1860s through the 1960s. # # Republican President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops into the South to desegregate the schools. # Republican President Eisenhower appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision. # Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, was the one who pushed through the civil rights laws of the 1960’s. # Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act. # Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. # Republican and black American, A. Phillip Randolph, organized the 1963 March by Dr. King on Washington. And to top it all: The KKK in Tennessee is endorsing OBAMA!!! http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=1227 Prominent White Supremacists want Obama in the white house http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/13636 The Aryan brotherhood wants Obama http://midsouthblack.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/the-aryan-brotherhood-supports-senator-barack-obama/ moreResolved Question: When did Liberals become so sexist? Are we back in the 1950's?
"...When Joe Biden tragically lost his wife and infant daughter in a car wreck in 1972, not a single colleague, friend or competitor advised him to quit his newly won Senate seat to raise his two little surviving sons. Rather, he was sworn into office from the injured boys' bedside, and took to commuting an hour and a half each way from Delaware to Washington. And when Biden's second wife gave birth to a daughter, no one thought to ask him to step aside and stay home.... Palin is a mother five times over. She also hunts, fishes, coaches hockey, has a day job as the governor of the state of Alaska - and is known to commute home from the state capital of Juneau daily during session. Just like Biden. And, until at least four months ago, Palin also had the ability to bear a child, which we've just learned is a talent she shares with her 17-year-old daughter. But women on the left, who fought long and hard for the ability to raise children simultaneously with election cash, are in spasms. (Some have simply kept silent. Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton - where are you?) The same lefty media that studiously ignored the adolescence of Chelsea Clinton can't wait to dig into Bristol Palin. The Diary section of Daily Kos Web site had a curious way to make Palin's daughter into a campaign issue: "Considering Palin was chosen solely for her religious right family values cred, Bristol's shotgun marriage and pregnancy are very fair game. They are the direct result of this lunatic abstinence-only garbage, and should be highlighted as such." The stupendously sexist New York Times printed a front-page article noting that some unnamed women argue over "whether there are enough hours in the day for her to take on the vice presidency, and whether she is right to try." Which left the field weirdly clear for Phyllis Schlafly, who helped defeat the Equal Right Amendment - and also ran for Congress while raising six children - to tell the Times, "People who don't have children, or who have only one or two, are kind of overwhelmed at the notion of five children." The only question we should be asking is: Can Sarah Palin do the job?" http://www.nypost.com/seven/09032008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/a_time_warped_sexist_assault_127183.htm Mikey Jones - you are pathetic if you think 90% of Republicans would be happy if Obama was shot... are you so blinded by your hatred? MichaelOB86 - Republicans aren't the only ones with interesting buttons... http://www.americans-working-together.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/obama_button.jpg NMMNG - why does it matter if I cut and paste? Maybe I thought this author expressed a question I actually thought should be asked...? And your shotgun question does nothing but show your own ignorance - you have no idea what is going on behind closed doors in the Palin family - even Barack Obama has said that he will not discuss family matters & considers them off limits (something I respect about him) Summer -- this is my point exactly. Why is the party of feminism (the Democratic Party) telling Sarah Palin she should stay at home and do her wifely duties? Good Guy - I have never considered race or gender a factor in this election... and I do not believe that the bulk of the Republican party does either. You forget that the Democratic party was the one that opposed integration and birthed such parties as the "Dixiecrats"... Could it be that the Democratic party is getting uncomfortable now that the Republicans are doing something publicly progressive? moreResolved Question: How would women benefit from anti-feminism? What if we got rid of "equality" legislation since the 1960's?
What would happen if we got rid of all the legislation related to equal pay, sexual harassment, equal education, pregnancy discrimination, paternal/maternal employment leave, marital rape, and violence against women, that have been passed since 1960-how would women (and men) benefit from anti-feminism? This would be some of the legislation that would be erased: 1963 The Equal Pay Act passes, requiring equal wages for women and men doing equal work. It is the first federal law prohibiting sex discrimination. 1964 The Federal Civil Rights Act passes, including Title VII, which guarantees equal opportunity in employment. Title VII is the statutory basis not only for equal opportunity and sex discrimination cases, but, as a subset of the latter, sexual harassment cases as well. The Civil Rights Act creates the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to enforce workplace equality. 1972 Title IX of the Education Amendments Act passes, guaranteeing equal access to academic and athletic resources regardless of gender. 1975 Congress opens U.S. military academies to women 1978 The Pregnancy Discrimination Act becomes federal law, recognizing that discrimination on the basis of pregnancy is discrimination on the basis of sex. The PDA guarantees pregnant women who are capable of working the right to do so, identical to employees with other, but similar, medical conditions. The Act also mandates that employers provide the same benefits to women at any stage of pregnancy, delivery, or recovery from delivery when they are medically unable to work as to all other employees with temporarily disabling conditions. It also forbids workplace discrimination against women based on the mere possibility of pregnancy. 1993 The Family & Medical Leave Act becomes law, based on the research and policy initiatives prepared by the Women's Law and Public Policy Fellowship class of 1985-86. President Bill Clinton selects the FMLA to be the first legislation signed in his presidency. President George Bush had twice vetoed similar bills. 1993 All 50 states make it illegal to rape your spouse. 1994 Passage of the federal Violence Against Women Act creates penalties for interstate stalking and other gender-based crime. moreResolved Question: please help me?its important!?
Can you please help me? i really need your help.? 1. What was the intent of the Immigration Act of 1965, which was passed during the Johnson administration? A.To increase the number of immigrants from northern and western Europe B. to eliminate quotas restricting immigration from certain countries C. to reduce the total annual number of immigrants to the United States <========== D. to stem the flow of political refugees to the United States 2. Kennedy believed that he could encourage stability in Latin America bY A. promoting economic development. <======== B. cooperating with Communist governments. C. supporting popular revolutions. D.ending social-reform programs. 3. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then A. was vetoed by the President. B. was approved by the Supreme Court. <======== C. became law 10 years later. D. failed in the ratification process. moreResolved Question: can you please help me? i really need your help.?
1. What was the intent of the Immigration Act of 1965, which was passed during the Johnson administration? A.To increase the number of immigrants from northern and western Europe B. to eliminate quotas restricting immigration from certain countries C. to reduce the total annual number of immigrants to the United States <========== D. to stem the flow of political refugees to the United States 2. Kennedy believed that he could encourage stability in Latin America bY A. promoting economic development. <======== B. cooperating with Communist governments. C. supporting popular revolutions. D.ending social-reform programs. 3. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then A. was vetoed by the President. B. was approved by the Supreme Court. <======== C. became law 10 years later. D. failed in the ratification process. moreResolved Question: please help me with my history its extra credit i got 50 questions cant get theses 10 points?
For items 1-5, match each term with its description below. Type the letter of your answer choice in the box below each description. *You will NOT use all the terms. Roe v. Wade migrant farm worker National Organization for Women (NOW) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) Latino Ralph Nader Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) American Indian Movement (AIM) counterculture Woodstock festival Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1. group that fought for Native American treaty rights and self-government (1 point) 2. group that worked for compensation for Japanese Americans interned during World War II (1 point) 3. Spanish-speaking person from Latin America (1 point) 4. person who moves from farm to farm planting and harvesting crops (1 point) 5. law that would make discrimination based on a person’s sex illegal (1 point) Multiple Choice Choose the item that best completes the statement or answers the question. IDENTIFYING MAIN IDEAS 6. After watching television coverage of the brutal tactics used against protesters by the Birmingham police, even opponents of the Civil Rights Movement were (1 point) appalled by the police violence. angry with the peaceful protesters. supportive of the actions of the police. uninterested in the confrontation. 7. Essayist James Baldwin wrote about the (1 point) white viewpoint on civil rights. benefits of a segregated society. effectiveness of sit-ins. violent consequences of segregation. 8. The Black Panthers wanted African Americans to (1 point) end the urban riots. lead their own communities. practice nonviolent protest. join interracial groups. 9. During the 1960 presidential campaign, John F. Kennedy promised to (1 point) win the Cold War against the Soviet Union. cut back dramatically on military spending. get the American economy moving again. abolish the electoral college. 10. What was the intent of the Immigration Act of 1965, which was passed during the Johnson administration? (1 point) to increase the number of immigrants from northern and western Europe to eliminate quotas restricting immigration from certain countries to reduce the total annual number of immigrants to the United States to stem the flow of political refugees to the United States 11. Kennedy believed that he could encourage stability in Latin America by (1 point) promoting economic development. cooperating with Communist governments. supporting popular revolutions. ending social-reform programs. 12. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then (1 point) was vetoed by the President. was approved by the Supreme Court. became law 10 years later. failed in the ratification process. 13. In the 1960s, Mexican Americans fought discrimination in (1 point) cultural and religious matters. labor unions. professional sports. jobs, education, and legal matters. 14. A major theme of the book Silent Spring, which helped start the Environmental Movement, was that (1 point) human beings are superior to the nature around them. human beings and nature are separate but equal. human beings and nature are separate and unequal. humans are part of nature, and all parts of nature interact. 15. Why did South Vietnamese military leaders overthrow Diem? (1 point) He had joined the Communists. He had lost American support. He had tried to flee Saigon. He had converted to Buddhism. Essay CRITICAL THINKING 16. Making Comparisons On the issue of segregation, compare the views of Martin Luther King, Jr. to those of Malcolm X. (5 points) moreResolved Question: Can you check my history work?
6. After watching television coverage of the brutal tactics used against protesters by the Birmingham police, even opponents of the Civil Rights Movement were appalled by the police violence. angry with the peaceful protesters. supportive of the actions of the police. --------- uninterested in the confrontation. 7. Essayist James Baldwin wrote about the white viewpoint on civil rights. benefits of a segregated society. effectiveness of sit-ins. violent consequences of segregation.--------- 8. The Black Panthers wanted African Americans to end the urban riots. --------- lead their own communities. practice nonviolent protest. join interracial groups. 9. During the 1960 presidential campaign, John F. Kennedy promised to win the Cold War against the Soviet Union. cut back dramatically on military spending. --------- get the American economy moving again. abolish the electoral college. 10. What was the intent of the Immigration Act of 1965, which was passed during the Johnson administration? to increase the number of immigrants from northern and western Europe to eliminate quotas restricting immigration from certain countries to reduce the total annual number of immigrants to the United States to stem the flow of political refugees to the United States--------- 11. Kennedy believed that he could encourage stability in Latin America by promoting economic development. cooperating with Communist governments. --------- supporting popular revolutions. ending social-reform programs. 12. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then was vetoed by the President. --------- was approved by the Supreme Court. became law 10 years later. failed in the ratification process. 13. In the 1960s, Mexican Americans fought discrimination in cultural and religious matters. labor unions. professional sports. --------- jobs, education, and legal matters. 14. A major theme of the book Silent Spring, which helped start the Environmental Movement, was that human beings are superior to the nature around them. human beings and nature are separate but equal. --------- human beings and nature are separate and unequal. humans are part of nature, and all parts of nature interact. 15. Why did South Vietnamese military leaders overthrow Diem? He had joined the Communists. --------- He had lost American support. He had tried to flee Saigon. He had converted to Buddhism. moreResolved Question: Can you check my history work?
6. After watching television coverage of the brutal tactics used against protesters by the Birmingham police, even opponents of the Civil Rights Movement were appalled by the police violence. angry with the peaceful protesters. supportive of the actions of the police. --------- uninterested in the confrontation. 7. Essayist James Baldwin wrote about the white viewpoint on civil rights. benefits of a segregated society. effectiveness of sit-ins. violent consequences of segregation.--------- 8. The Black Panthers wanted African Americans to end the urban riots. --------- lead their own communities. practice nonviolent protest. join interracial groups. 9. During the 1960 presidential campaign, John F. Kennedy promised to win the Cold War against the Soviet Union. cut back dramatically on military spending. --------- get the American economy moving again. abolish the electoral college. 10. What was the intent of the Immigration Act of 1965, which was passed during the Johnson administration? to increase the number of immigrants from northern and western Europe to eliminate quotas restricting immigration from certain countries to reduce the total annual number of immigrants to the United States to stem the flow of political refugees to the United States--------- 11. Kennedy believed that he could encourage stability in Latin America by promoting economic development. cooperating with Communist governments. --------- supporting popular revolutions. ending social-reform programs. 12. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then was vetoed by the President. --------- was approved by the Supreme Court. became law 10 years later. failed in the ratification process. 13. In the 1960s, Mexican Americans fought discrimination in cultural and religious matters. labor unions. professional sports. --------- jobs, education, and legal matters. 14. A major theme of the book Silent Spring, which helped start the Environmental Movement, was that human beings are superior to the nature around them. human beings and nature are separate but equal. --------- human beings and nature are separate and unequal. humans are part of nature, and all parts of nature interact. 15. Why did South Vietnamese military leaders overthrow Diem? He had joined the Communists. --------- He had lost American support. He had tried to flee Saigon. He had converted to Buddhism. moreVoting Question: i need some homework help!!?
2. One example of the shift in attitudes brought about by the women's movement was a significant change in (1 point) racial discrimination. men's treatment of women. women's career goals. homemaking tasks. 3. Many women rejected the women's movement because they (1 point) preferred traditional roles. thought it was too weak to effect change. thought it was too easy on men. wanted to achieve equality on their own. 4. As a result of their experiences in the civil rights movement, many women learned the importance of (1 point) writing books about women. taking advantage of legal tools. leaving policy decisions to men. keeping quiet about controversial issues. 5. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then (1 point) was vetoed by the President. was approved by the Supreme Court. became law 10 years later. failed in the ratification process. moreResolved Question: history!!! can you help? thanks.?
2.One example of the shift in attitudes brought about by the women's movement was a significant change in A) racial discriminatio. B) men's treatment of women C) women's career goals D) homemaking tasks 3.Many women rejected the women's movement because they A) preferred traditional roles B) thought it was too weak to effect change C) thought it was too easy on men D) wanted to achieve equality on their own 4.As a result of their experiences in the civil rights movement, many women learned the importance of A) writing books about women B) taking advantage of legal tools C) leaving policy decisions to men D) keeping quiet about controversial issues 5.The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then A) was vetoed by the President B) was approved by the Supreme Court C) became law 10 years later D) failed in the ratification process moreResolved Question: Can you check my history homework????
1. The term feminism describes the theory of women's special nature. <==== the equality of men and women. women's superiority over men. women's role of serving men. 2. One example of the shift in attitudes brought about by the women's movement was a significant change in racial discrimination. men's treatment of women. <==== women's career goals. homemaking tasks. 3. Many women rejected the women's movement because they preferred traditional roles. thought it was too weak to effect change. thought it was too easy on men. wanted to achieve equality on their own.<==== 4. As a result of their experiences in the civil rights movement, many women learned the importance of writing books about women. <==== taking advantage of legal tools. leaving policy decisions to men. keeping quiet about controversial issues. 5. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then was vetoed by the President. was approved by the Supreme Court. became law 10 years later. <==== failed in the ratification process. moreResolved Question: Can you please check my history??
1. The term feminism describes the theory of women's special nature. <==== the equality of men and women. women's superiority over men. women's role of serving men. 2. One example of the shift in attitudes brought about by the women's movement was a significant change in racial discrimination. men's treatment of women. <==== women's career goals. homemaking tasks. 3. Many women rejected the women's movement because they preferred traditional roles. thought it was too weak to effect change. thought it was too easy on men. wanted to achieve equality on their own.<==== 4. As a result of their experiences in the civil rights movement, many women learned the importance of writing books about women. <==== taking advantage of legal tools. leaving policy decisions to men. keeping quiet about controversial issues. 5. The Equal Rights Amendment passed Congress in 1972 and then was vetoed by the President. was approved by the Supreme Court. became law 10 years later. <==== failed in the ratification process. moreResolved Question: u s district court for new jersey district prayer of candidate as president rev dr kamal karna roy of usa ?
wikipedial , was prayed to be taken into custody of laws and by order of usdc , new hampshire,nh, usa for civil contempt of the said court as wikipedia was notified by plaintiffs that complaints agaist them were filed lawfully and court order was pending at usdc, concord nh filed as on 2.6.2008, AGAINST ABOUT 300+ DEFENDANTS WHO WERE ENGAGED IN CAUSING PAIN, HARMS AND DEMOCRATIC DAMAGES LIKE PRE DEATH PAINS TO A U S PATRIOT FOR DENIAL OF DEMOCRATIC BENEFITS TO THE REVEREND DR ROY AS HE WAS AN ORDAINED CLERGY ON VOW OR POVERTY, I R S RULE, AND AS SUCH , HE REMAINED POOR MOST OF HIS LIFE, AND HE WAS A U S AMERIAN POOR, AND HE WAS A MEMBER OF WEAKER COMMUNITIES IN USA AND WAS A MEMBER OF MILLIONS OF HAVE_ NOT IN USA, ABOUT 10 % OF TOTAL U S POPULATION OR 300 MILLIONS IN U S.S , AS SUCH DR WAS VIRTUALLY LEFT OUT BY THE U S NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS MEDIA CONGLOMERATES , AS A CANDIDATE OF HIGH OFFICE AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 ELECTORAL COMPETITION & CAMPAIGN, FOR PURPOSE. hE THE RICH, POWERFUL,ELITES IN USA WERE COVERED IN NEWWS AND AGENTS /CANDIDATES OF HAVE_NOTS WERE LEFT OUT AS IF CANDIDATE VIZ DR KAMAL ROY WAS NOT A CONTESTANT. U S GOVT, FEC, WASHINGTON DC DID NOT LET THE NAMES OF CANDIDATES IN THE FIELD ADEOUATELY; tHE STATS IN USA DID NOT GIVE AID LIKE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE TO WEAKER CANDIDATES , SO SUH CANDIDATES FAILED TO GET FOCUSSED AS IF THEY BELONG AS CONTESTANTS. sTATE BOARD FAILED TO NOTIIFY DATES OF PRIMARY ELECTIONS PRPOSED BY THEM , AS LAWS REQUIRED. sIMILARLYHILLARY , OBAMA GOT FREE PUBLICITY VIZ HILLARY'S DAUGHTER CHELSEA CLINTON, HER HUSBAND BILL CLINTON RECEIVED PUBLICITY FREE OF COST TO PROJECT HILLARY WHO WAS TRYING TO GRAB LEADERSHIP AS A FIRST TIME WOMAN TO GET ELETED AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 BUT THE MEDIA FELL SHY TO PROJECT A MEMBER OF THE HAVE_NOTS. aS SUCH ELECTION WAS IN PROGRESS IN INEQUITABLE SITUATION. DR ROY AS SUCH FILED ANOTHER PETITION FOR VIOLATIONS WERE DETECTED IN THE JURISDICTION TO A RELIEF TO POSTPONE U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2009. aN ACTION SIMILAR, WAS EARLER FILED WITH USD COURT, N D OF CALIFORNIA , SAN FRNCISCO DIVN AS VIOLATIONS WERE FOUND IN THE JURISDICTION. AS DR ROY IS A CANDIDATE IN THE JURISDICTION AND USA GOVT WAS COMMON PARTY AS A DEFENDANT, PRORATA CLAIM WAS PERMISSIBLE UNDER CURRENT LAS FOR SOME WHAT VARIOUS DEGEE OF VIOLATIONS IN DIVERSE JURISDICTION, DR ROY IS MBA (M S DEGREE FROM SUNY MARITIME OLLEGE,NEW YORK CITY ,1974,COLLEGE ID 578804399, HE HAD PH, D IN MANAGEMENT, DOCTORATE IN RELIGIONS:HAS LL. B (LAWS) FROM ACCREDITED FOREIGN SCHOOL. hE HAD ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN PUBLIC ADMN , FROM U S D A GRADUATA=E SCHOOL, WASHINGTON DC , 1972; BUT HE WASBEING FOOLED IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTION, THE SAID ELECTION WAS LIKE A DOG_FIGHT ,KAMAL WROTE IN COURT ACTION, WHEREIN SELECTED DOGS OF POWERFUL OWNERS OF THE ANIMALS WERE ALLOWED TO THE FIGHT WITH DIFFERENT DEGREES OF DEMOCRATIC PROIVILEGES. sO DR ROY PRAYED TO POSTPONE NOV 2008 ELCTION, UNTIL COUT DECIDED COURT ACTION AGAINT DEFENDANTS FOR DAMAGES AND KAMAL'S RIGHT TO BE ELECTED AT FUTURE PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST FOR REPLACED AND POSTPPONED NOV 2008 U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ... THE REVEREND MS LISA N R ALSTON, R.N (NURSING,NY STATE, BA HON, M.D (RELIGIOND0 EXECUTIE OFFICER & SECRETATAR & THE REVEREND MS GARGI LAHIRI , ASST. TREASURER, ELECTION COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV Y DR KAMAL ROY ELECTION COMMITTEE 2008 ( APPROVED BY CANDIDATE ROY ON 2. 3 .AS AMENDED COMMENMT, BUT CIVIL COMPLAINTS WAS LEGALLY & DULY FILED WITH THE NOTED COURT ON 2. 2. 2008. REGARDS AND THANKS TO ALL FOR TAKING A DEMOCRATIC EVENT AS IS I JUNGLE DEMOCRATIC CONDITION IN US ELECTION AND CAMPAIGN WHERIN U S ANTI TRUST LAWS PROHIBITING ANY COMPETITION WITH INDUSTRIAL PRODUCES, BUT IN THE DISGUISE OF FREE PRESS THE NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS CONGLOMERATES VIZ THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, USA, CNN USA, THE NEW YORK TIMES, NEW YORK, NEWS CORP OF RUPERT MURDOCH AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE ETC, ET AL AS NAMED AS DEFENDANTS IN THE ACTION AND INCLUDING U S AMERICAN GOD/S OF RELIGIONSAS HUMAN_ANIMALS’ CONCEIVED AND CUSTOM_MADE GOD/S OF ALL RELIGIONS FAILED TO OVERSEE PAINS AND DAMAGES OF DR KAMA K K ROYSUFFERING DENIAL OF EQUITABLE RIGHTS TO CONTEST ELECTION POOR OR RICH, HAVE_NOTS AND ELITES IN USA., ACTION WAS TITLED AND PROPOSED AS “ ASSOCIATION OF COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV DR KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR BY KAMAL ROY PRO SE FOR SELF AND FINCIALLY STARVING 120 + UNINCORPORATED LAWFUL ASSOCIATIONS OF USA (DR ROY BY FIRST AMENDMENT OF US CONSTITUTION IS LAWFULLY PERMITTED TO ASSOCIATE AND ACT FOR SELF AND ASSOCIATIONS EVEN BEING A POOR AND MEMBER OF HAVE-NOTS AND DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE IN USA AND FOR PLAINTIFFS V. “ PEOPLE’S ASSOCIATION OF FOLLOWERS OF CONCEPTS THAT HUMAN ANIMALS’ CONCEOIVED GOD/S OF RELIGIONS AND SUCH CUSTOM MADE GOD/S OF DEMOCRATIC ENTITIES, WE THE PEOPLE IN GENERAL RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTSOF SUCH MAN_MADE GOD/S ; THE LIMITED SUCCESS AND DEFICITS OF SUCH GOD/S IN DEMOCRATIC SURVIVAL WITH EQUITIES FOR ALL AS DESIGNED..ETC” .. DEFENDANT # 1 . DEFENDANT # 2 USA GOVT, WASHINGTON DC ET AL , 300 + DEFENDANTS. gOOD LUCK TO ALL IN FAILING DEMOCRACY IN USA WITH STRUGGLE BY WE THE PEOPLE TO REGENERATE, SOONER THE BETTER. ASSTS TO DR , THE REV KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR A REPUBLIAN CANDIDATE OF NEXT U S PRESIDENT 1008 OR ONWARDS.approved by kamal roy, the re dr, m s (suny maritime college 1974 id #578 80 4399) ph. d. (amaagement) ll. b (law) d. d (religions) 9 from foreign chools, accedited)adv cert in public admn (USDA graduate school, washington dc 1972) author, ordained clergy on vow of poverty, u s american poor, a member of weaker communities in usa of 10 millions strongs (united to claim leadership in usa so far hijacked from such members of we the people in usa pursuat to us consttution, & now in struggle for equal and equitable circumstance to contest for electoral compretition.u s anti trust laws with news as industrial produce are and were used, abused, manipulated by us news media & conglomerates to curb chances of a memb er of underdog communities in usa during current electioneering so cmplaints were filed in different jurisdiction in federal couts kn nd of california at sanfrancisco, district of new jessey, and as on 2.6. 2008 in the us district court for district of new Hampshire at concord, with misc civil rights violations against the kamal k k roy aka j g jr and he has been a fec regd us presidential candidate as a republicanhe was damaged, pained and damaged in democratic jungledemocracy in usa and he as such prayed for injunction a and reliefs to postpone nov 2008 us presidential electoral competition for misc democratic abuses. u s american human_animas' conceive god/s not unfamiar or not recognised god/s of all reigions in usa, usa govt, states of usa, all board of election made a fool of dr roy, as was thecase of fec, poliotical parties, especially beneficiaries of violations were clearly hillary clinton, bobama, john mc cain et also por in all measures except abilities tto run the nation named usa ,is losing chances to win presidency for him, that was thelegal basis for civil rights violations and allegations in court and prayer to postpone presidential election 2008 until ills and deficits are replenished to kamal roy et al, the disadvantaded in u s america the land of inequal oppotunities as alleged Issue by gargi r Lahiri,m a, asst treasurer of campaign committee for dr roy tha plaintiff for all plaintiffs pre se as plaintiffs associations are all unincorporated , & pursuant to 1 st us constitution kamal was able to all assocn and act, & and as clergy on vow of povverty (irs rule ) he may not accept any money except cost if any, not for democratic strategy played in action for the persons of we the people, of damages money claimed 1. 5 trillions of us $ claimed which could be awarded by jury from we thhe people, in each jurisdictions as stated in civil actions separately in pro rata damages claimed lawfully. approve text bycandidate roy, gargi lahiri, Home > Politics & Government > Elections > Your Open Question vishwa d Member since: 17 November 2007 Total points: 0 (Level 1) Your Open QuestionShow me another » NEW SEGREGATION IN u s OF AMERICA: POWERFULS VS POWERELESS, WEAKER PEOPLE , DISADVANTAGED IN USA ET AL; ? REVEREND, KAMAL KARNA KARUNA ROY SID PUBLICLY ON SUPER TUESDAY OF PRIMAMARIES, AT A SRANAC LAKE, NEW YORK TO HIS VOLUNTTEE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANTS IN THE ELECT KAMAL ROY ELECTION COMMITTEE,ON 2.5. 2008, THAT NEWER SEGREGATION PATTERNS IN U S AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, THE SEGREGATION BETWEEN OLD BLACK AMERIC V WHITE USA IS REDUCING SOME RELEVANCE FOR WHITER BLAKS IN USA VIZ oBAMA, A CANDIDATE , BUT STAUCH SEGREGATION IN BETWEEN POORS IN U S AMERICA, HAVE_NOTS IN USA , THE DISADVANTAGED IN USA , SIMILAR GROUPS IN USA IN JEOPARDY OF DEMOCRATIC DEFICITS, SUCH TOTAL POPULATION OF SEGREGATEDU S AMERICAN WAS OVER 10 % OF TOTAL POPULATION OF APPROXIMATELY 300 MILLIONS, VS RICH, ELITES, POWERFULS, BILLIONAIRS ET AL, AS ANOTHER GROUP. ARE EXPANDING MANIFOLDS IN SEGREGATIONS. DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP RIGHTS WERE REDUCED TO ALMOST ZERO IN TRUEST STATISTICS. oBAMA AND HILLARY BELONGED TO SOME WHITER POWERFUL GROUPS . THE REV KAMAL KARNA SAID , NO OBAMA, NO HILLARY AS US PRESIDENT TO BE ELECTED AND A NEW FACE SHOUD BE DRAFTED AS MR/MS CLEAN TO BE CANDIDATES OR REPUBLICAN / DEMOCRATIC PARTIES TO BE ELECTED AT GENERAL ELECTION IN 2008 . IF AND WHEN ELECTIONS SHOULD BE HELD. DR ROY APPLIED IN U S FEDERAL COURTS AT VARIOUS COURT JURISDICTIONS TO POSTPONE THE GENERAL ELECTION OF NOV 2008 FOR ELECTION OF A US PRESIDEDENT IN USA FOR MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS.SEE FOLLOWING :AMENDED COMMENT :THE REVEREND DR KAMAL KARNA ROY AS ON 2.2. 2008 FILED A CIVIL RIGHTS ALLEGATION IN u s DISTRICT COURT FOR NEW JERSEY DISTRICT AT TRENTON N J & futher filed on 2/6/ 2008 in new hampshire distrit us d court for new hampshire jurisdictional violations (for pro_rata damages, which included violator as defendant viz "wikipedia free encyclopedia of st petersburg, florida , usa et al, further david w brooks a user editor of wikipedia was namked as a non hostile defendant to defendant to tell truth of violations, wikipedia chief executive was cited for civilo court contempt violations as the complaint against wikipedia was pending and subjudice, the article on kamal karna roy was deleted, to change records. in fact article was published without intervies with kamal roy , when he or his associates/volunteers wanted to edit the article , wikipedia against their poplicy of publication was discriminatory unlawful way compromise over 55 edits and fijally deleted the original or any reedited article to defame kamal karna roy illegally. This was a conspiratory act, as such chie executive of wikipedial , was prayed to be taken into custody of laws and by order of usdc , new hampshire,nh, usa for civil contempt of the said court as wikipedia was notified by plaintiffs that complaints agaist them were filed lawfully and court order was pending at usdc, concord nh filed as on 2.6.2008, AGAINST ABOUT 300+ DEFENDANTS WHO WERE ENGAGED IN CAUSING PAIN, HARMS AND DEMOCRATIC DAMAGES LIKE PRE DEATH PAINS TO A U S PATRIOT FOR DENIAL OF DEMOCRATIC BENEFITS TO THE REVEREND DR ROY AS HE WAS AN ORDAINED CLERGY ON VOW OR POVERTY, I R S RULE, AND AS SUCH , HE REMAINED POOR MOST OF HIS LIFE, AND HE WAS A U S AMERIAN POOR, AND HE WAS A MEMBER OF WEAKER COMMUNITIES IN USA AND WAS A MEMBER OF MILLIONS OF HAVE_ NOT IN USA, ABOUT 10 % OF TOTAL U S POPULATION OR 300 MILLIONS IN U S.S , AS SUCH DR WAS VIRTUALLY LEFT OUT BY THE U S NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS MEDIA CONGLOMERATES , AS A CANDIDATE OF HIGH OFFICE AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 ELECTORAL COMPETITION & CAMPAIGN, FOR PURPOSE. hE THE RICH, POWERFUL,ELITES IN USA WERE COVERED IN NEWWS AND AGENTS /CANDIDATES OF HAVE_NOTS WERE LEFT OUT AS IF CANDIDATE VIZ DR KAMAL ROY WAS NOT A CONTESTANT. U S GOVT, FEC, WASHINGTON DC DID NOT LET THE NAMES OF CANDIDATES IN THE FIELD ADEOUATELY; tHE STATS IN USA DID NOT GIVE AID LIKE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE TO WEAKER CANDIDATES , SO SUH CANDIDATES FAILED TO GET FOCUSSED AS IF THEY BELONG AS CONTESTANTS. sTATE BOARD FAILED TO NOTIIFY DATES OF PRIMARY ELECTIONS PRPOSED BY THEM , AS LAWS REQUIRED. sIMILARLYHILLARY , OBAMA GOT FREE PUBLICITY VIZ HILLARY'S DAUGHTER CHELSEA CLINTON, HER HUSBAND BILL CLINTON RECEIVED PUBLICITY FREE OF COST TO PROJECT HILLARY WHO WAS TRYING TO GRAB LEADERSHIP AS A FIRST TIME WOMAN TO GET ELETED AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 BUT THE MEDIA FELL SHY TO PROJECT A MEMBER OF THE HAVE_NOTS. aS SUCH ELECTION WAS IN PROGRESS IN INEQUITABLE SITUATION. DR ROY AS SUCH FILED ANOTHER PETITION FOR VIOLATIONS WERE DETECTED IN THE JURISDICTION TO A RELIEF TO POSTPONE U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2009. aN ACTION SIMILAR, WAS EARLER FILED WITH USD COURT, N D OF CALIFORNIA , SAN FRNCISCO DIVN AS VIOLATIONS WERE FOUND IN THE JURISDICTION. AS DR ROY IS A CANDIDATE IN THE JURISDICTION AND USA GOVT WAS COMMON PARTY AS A DEFENDANT, PRORATA CLAIM WAS PERMISSIBLE UNDER CURRENT LAS FOR SOME WHAT VARIOUS DEGEE OF VIOLATIONS IN DIVERSE JURISDICTION, DR ROY IS MBA (M S DEGREE FROM SUNY MARITIME OLLEGE,NEW YORK CITY ,1974,COLLEGE ID 578804399, HE HAD PH, D IN MANAGEMENT, DOCTORATE IN RELIGIONS:HAS LL. B (LAWS) FROM ACCREDITED FOREIGN SCHOOL. hE HAD ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN PUBLIC ADMN , FROM U S D A GRADUATA=E SCHOOL, WASHINGTON DC , 1972; BUT HE WASBEING FOOLED IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTION, THE SAID ELECTION WAS LIKE A DOG_FIGHT ,KAMAL WROTE IN COURT ACTION, WHEREIN SELECTED DOGS OF POWERFUL OWNERS OF THE ANIMALS WERE ALLOWED TO THE FIGHT WITH DIFFERENT DEGREES OF DEMOCRATIC PROIVILEGES. sO DR ROY PRAYED TO POSTPONE NOV 2008 ELCTION, UNTIL COUT DECIDED COURT ACTION AGAINT DEFENDANTS FOR DAMAGES AND KAMAL'S RIGHT TO BE ELECTED AT FUTURE PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST FOR REPLACED AND POSTPPONED NOV 2008 U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ... THE REVEREND MS LISA N R ALSTON, R.N (NURSING,NY STATE, BA HON, M.D (RELIGIOND0 EXECUTIE OFFICER & SECRETATAR & THE REVEREND MS GARGI LAHIRI , ASST. TREASURER, ELECTION COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV Y DR KAMAL ROY ELECTION COMMITTEE 2008 ( APPROVED BY CANDIDATE ROY ON 2. 3 .AS AMENDED COMMENMT, BUT CIVIL COMPLAINTS WAS LEGALLY & DULY FILED WITH THE NOTED COURT ON 2. 2. 2008. REGARDS AND THANKS TO ALL FOR TAKING A DEMOCRATIC EVENT AS IS I JUNGLE DEMOCRATIC CONDITION IN US ELECTION AND CAMPAIGN WHERIN U S ANTI TRUST LAWS PROHIBITING ANY COMPETITION WITH INDUSTRIAL PRODUCES, BUT IN THE DISGUISE OF FREE PRESS THE NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS CONGLOMERATES VIZ THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, USA, CNN USA, THE NEW YORK TIMES, NEW YORK, NEWS CORP OF RUPERT MURDOCH AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE ETC, ET AL AS NAMED AS DEFENDANTS IN THE ACTION AND INCLUDING U S AMERICAN GOD/S OF RELIGIONSAS HUMAN_ANIMALS’ CONCEIVED AND CUSTOM_MADE GOD/S OF ALL RELIGIONS FAILED TO OVERSEE PAINS AND DAMAGES OF DR KAMA K K ROYSUFFERING DENIAL OF EQUITABLE RIGHTS TO CONTEST ELECTION POOR OR RICH, HAVE_NOTS AND ELITES IN USA., ACTION WAS TITLED AND PROPOSED AS “ ASSOCIATION OF COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV DR KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR BY KAMAL ROY PRO SE FOR SELF AND FINCIALLY STARVING 120 + UNINCORPORATED LAWFUL ASSOCIATIONS OF USA (DR ROY BY FIRST AMENDMENT OF US CONSTITUTION IS LAWFULLY PERMITTED TO ASSOCIATE AND ACT FOR SELF AND ASSOCIATIONS EVEN BEING A POOR AND MEMBER OF HAVE-NOTS AND DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE IN USA AND FOR PLAINTIFFS V. “ PEOPLE’S ASSOCIATION OF FOLLOWERS OF CONCEPTS THAT HUMAN ANIMALS’ CONCEOIVED GOD/S OF RELIGIONS AND SUCH CUSTOM MADE GOD/S OF DEMOCRATIC ENTITIES, WE THE PEOPLE IN GENERAL RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTSOF SUCH MAN_MADE GOD/S ; THE LIMITED SUCCESS AND DEFICITS OF SUCH GOD/S IN DEMOCRATIC SURVIVAL WITH EQUITIES FOR ALL AS DESIGNED..ETC” .. DEFENDANT # 1 . DEFENDANT # 2 USA GOVT, WASHINGTON DC ET AL , 300 + DEFENDANTS. gOOD LUCK TO ALL IN FAILING DEMOCRACY IN USA WITH STRUGGLE BY WE THE PEOPLE TO REGENERATE, SOONER THE BETTER. ASSTS TO DR , THE REV KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR A REPUBLIAN CANDIDATE OF NEXT U S PRESIDENT 1008 OR ONWARDS.THE REV MS GARGI R LAHIRI ASSTTREASURER AND EXECUTIVE ADVISOR TO ELECTION COMMITTEE ELECT THE REVEREND DR KAMAL KARNA KAUNA ROY GUAM BORN CLERGY, A US CITIZEN BY BIRTH PURSUANT TO U S ACT 1978 FOR GUAM BORN PEOPLE LIVING IN MAINLAND,USA ON DATE OF ENACTMENT OF LAW FOR GUAM BORN PEOPLE; dR KAMAL ROY LIVED IN NEW YORK STATE SINCE 1968; CURRENTLY A REPUBLICAN PARTY HOPEFUL AND CANDIDATE IN U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORAL COMPETITION 2008 : REV LISA N ROY ALSTON, CASUAL PAID EMPLOYEE AND PART TIME VOLUNTEER EXEUTIVE OFFICER I OF THE GROUP/ NURSING ADVISOR OF GROUP TO WING OF THE NON PROFIT TAX EXEMPT BY IRS VIZ HANDICAP INTERESTS INT'L WORLD RELIGIONS GROUP THE GROUP PROMOTING STRATEGY OF POOR CITIZEN, HAVE_NOTS, DISADVANTAGE " MEMBER OF "WE THE PEOPLE " OF USA, DO CLAIM LEADERSHIP IN DEMOCRACY IN USA ET AL FOR THE FIRST TIME IN DEMOCRATIC HISTORY ,PRESENT AND FOR THE FUTURE, AS A POLICY OF NATIONS VIZ USA, ALEADING DEMOCRACY IN WORLD AND A LEADING PIONEER IN DEMOCRATIC WORLD, UNFORTUNATELY HOWEVER, THE COUNTRY IS RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN GLOBEBUT JUNGLE DEMOCRATIC DYSFUNCTIONS ARE DOMINANT FOR 30 MILLION HAVEMUCH_NOTS IN USA OUT OF 300 MILLION TOTAL POPULATION OF U S CITIZENRY:: COORDINATOR LISA N ROYREFORMS INT'L WING OF hii-W R GROUP.ELECTIONEERING IS A DEMOCRATIC PROCESS, THE PROCESS NEED TO BE SUPERVISED BY WE THE PEOPLE:APPROVED BY DR ROY A STRATEGIC AND LAWFUL, FEC REGISTERED CANDIDATE OF ELECTION, US PRESIDENT 2008. DR ROY MOVED TO AT LEAST 3 USDC FOR VARIOUS DISTRICT JURISDICTIONS TO POSTPONE NOV 2008 US PRESIDENTIA ELECTION FOR VARIOUS VIOLATIONS OF LAWS IN CAMPAIGN AND INJUNCTIONS WERE SOUGHT IN COURTS ON USA ET AL INCLUDING WIKIPEDIA ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FLORIDA HOUSED IN ST PETERSBURG FOR CURBING FREE SPEECH AND FREE EXPRESSION OF THE CANDIDATE ROY. THE DEFENDANTS INCLUDED 375+DEFENDANTS WHICH INCLUDED ALL NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS MEDIA CONGOMERATES, U S AMERICAN HUMAN_ANIMALS' CONCEIVED GOD/S OF ALL RELIGIONS IN USA, LATER DEMOCRATIC CONCEPTUAL GOD/S ARE FAILING AND SINCE FAIING FOR DECADES IN USA AND HARMED, PAINED THE PROSE PLAINTIFF DR KAMAL K K ROY AND OTHER PLAINTIFF UNINCORPORATED LAWFUL ASSOCIATIONS.SO DEMOCRACY AND TRUEST EFFORTS TO REGENERATE BENEFITS TO POORER, WEAKER CITIZENS NEED TO BE RESTORED AS PER OPTIMUM, POSSIBLY NEVER EQUAL,, BENEFITS. moreResolved Question: KAMAL K K ROY & DEMOCRACY IN usa AND AROUND THE GLOBE;MAY BE SOME DAY U MAY LIKE TO READ; IS IT TRUE ?
wikipedial , was prayed to be taken into custody of laws and by order of usdc , new hampshire,nh, usa for civil contempt of the said court as wikipedia was notified by plaintiffs that complaints agaist them were filed lawfully and court order was pending at usdc, concord nh filed as on 2.6.2008, AGAINST ABOUT 300+ DEFENDANTS WHO WERE ENGAGED IN CAUSING PAIN, HARMS AND DEMOCRATIC DAMAGES LIKE PRE DEATH PAINS TO A U S PATRIOT FOR DENIAL OF DEMOCRATIC BENEFITS TO THE REVEREND DR ROY AS HE WAS AN ORDAINED CLERGY ON VOW OR POVERTY, I R S RULE, AND AS SUCH , HE REMAINED POOR MOST OF HIS LIFE, AND HE WAS A U S AMERIAN POOR, AND HE WAS A MEMBER OF WEAKER COMMUNITIES IN USA AND WAS A MEMBER OF MILLIONS OF HAVE_ NOT IN USA, ABOUT 10 % OF TOTAL U S POPULATION OR 300 MILLIONS IN U S.S , AS SUCH DR WAS VIRTUALLY LEFT OUT BY THE U S NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS MEDIA CONGLOMERATES , AS A CANDIDATE OF HIGH OFFICE AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 ELECTORAL COMPETITION & CAMPAIGN, FOR PURPOSE. hE THE RICH, POWERFUL,ELITES IN USA WERE COVERED IN NEWWS AND AGENTS /CANDIDATES OF HAVE_NOTS WERE LEFT OUT AS IF CANDIDATE VIZ DR KAMAL ROY WAS NOT A CONTESTANT. U S GOVT, FEC, WASHINGTON DC DID NOT LET THE NAMES OF CANDIDATES IN THE FIELD ADEOUATELY; tHE STATS IN USA DID NOT GIVE AID LIKE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE TO WEAKER CANDIDATES , SO SUH CANDIDATES FAILED TO GET FOCUSSED AS IF THEY BELONG AS CONTESTANTS. sTATE BOARD FAILED TO NOTIIFY DATES OF PRIMARY ELECTIONS PRPOSED BY THEM , AS LAWS REQUIRED. sIMILARLYHILLARY , OBAMA GOT FREE PUBLICITY VIZ HILLARY'S DAUGHTER CHELSEA CLINTON, HER HUSBAND BILL CLINTON RECEIVED PUBLICITY FREE OF COST TO PROJECT HILLARY WHO WAS TRYING TO GRAB LEADERSHIP AS A FIRST TIME WOMAN TO GET ELETED AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 BUT THE MEDIA FELL SHY TO PROJECT A MEMBER OF THE HAVE_NOTS. aS SUCH ELECTION WAS IN PROGRESS IN INEQUITABLE SITUATION. DR ROY AS SUCH FILED ANOTHER PETITION FOR VIOLATIONS WERE DETECTED IN THE JURISDICTION TO A RELIEF TO POSTPONE U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2009. aN ACTION SIMILAR, WAS EARLER FILED WITH USD COURT, N D OF CALIFORNIA , SAN FRNCISCO DIVN AS VIOLATIONS WERE FOUND IN THE JURISDICTION. AS DR ROY IS A CANDIDATE IN THE JURISDICTION AND USA GOVT WAS COMMON PARTY AS A DEFENDANT, PRORATA CLAIM WAS PERMISSIBLE UNDER CURRENT LAS FOR SOME WHAT VARIOUS DEGEE OF VIOLATIONS IN DIVERSE JURISDICTION, DR ROY IS MBA (M S DEGREE FROM SUNY MARITIME OLLEGE,NEW YORK CITY ,1974,COLLEGE ID 578804399, HE HAD PH, D IN MANAGEMENT, DOCTORATE IN RELIGIONS:HAS LL. B (LAWS) FROM ACCREDITED FOREIGN SCHOOL. hE HAD ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN PUBLIC ADMN , FROM U S D A GRADUATA=E SCHOOL, WASHINGTON DC , 1972; BUT HE WASBEING FOOLED IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTION, THE SAID ELECTION WAS LIKE A DOG_FIGHT ,KAMAL WROTE IN COURT ACTION, WHEREIN SELECTED DOGS OF POWERFUL OWNERS OF THE ANIMALS WERE ALLOWED TO THE FIGHT WITH DIFFERENT DEGREES OF DEMOCRATIC PROIVILEGES. sO DR ROY PRAYED TO POSTPONE NOV 2008 ELCTION, UNTIL COUT DECIDED COURT ACTION AGAINT DEFENDANTS FOR DAMAGES AND KAMAL'S RIGHT TO BE ELECTED AT FUTURE PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST FOR REPLACED AND POSTPPONED NOV 2008 U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ... THE REVEREND MS LISA N R ALSTON, R.N (NURSING,NY STATE, BA HON, M.D (RELIGIOND0 EXECUTIE OFFICER & SECRETATAR & THE REVEREND MS GARGI LAHIRI , ASST. TREASURER, ELECTION COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV Y DR KAMAL ROY ELECTION COMMITTEE 2008 ( APPROVED BY CANDIDATE ROY ON 2. 3 .AS AMENDED COMMENMT, BUT CIVIL COMPLAINTS WAS LEGALLY & DULY FILED WITH THE NOTED COURT ON 2. 2. 2008. REGARDS AND THANKS TO ALL FOR TAKING A DEMOCRATIC EVENT AS IS I JUNGLE DEMOCRATIC CONDITION IN US ELECTION AND CAMPAIGN WHERIN U S ANTI TRUST LAWS PROHIBITING ANY COMPETITION WITH INDUSTRIAL PRODUCES, BUT IN THE DISGUISE OF FREE PRESS THE NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS CONGLOMERATES VIZ THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, USA, CNN USA, THE NEW YORK TIMES, NEW YORK, NEWS CORP OF RUPERT MURDOCH AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE ETC, ET AL AS NAMED AS DEFENDANTS IN THE ACTION AND INCLUDING U S AMERICAN GOD/S OF RELIGIONSAS HUMAN_ANIMALS’ CONCEIVED AND CUSTOM_MADE GOD/S OF ALL RELIGIONS FAILED TO OVERSEE PAINS AND DAMAGES OF DR KAMA K K ROYSUFFERING DENIAL OF EQUITABLE RIGHTS TO CONTEST ELECTION POOR OR RICH, HAVE_NOTS AND ELITES IN USA., ACTION WAS TITLED AND PROPOSED AS “ ASSOCIATION OF COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV DR KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR BY KAMAL ROY PRO SE FOR SELF AND FINCIALLY STARVING 120 + UNINCORPORATED LAWFUL ASSOCIATIONS OF USA (DR ROY BY FIRST AMENDMENT OF US CONSTITUTION IS LAWFULLY PERMITTED TO ASSOCIATE AND ACT FOR SELF AND ASSOCIATIONS EVEN BEING A POOR AND MEMBER OF HAVE-NOTS AND DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE IN USA AND FOR PLAINTIFFS V. “ PEOPLE’S ASSOCIATION OF FOLLOWERS OF CONCEPTS THAT HUMAN ANIMALS’ CONCEOIVED GOD/S OF RELIGIONS AND SUCH CUSTOM MADE GOD/S OF DEMOCRATIC ENTITIES, WE THE PEOPLE IN GENERAL RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTSOF SUCH MAN_MADE GOD/S ; THE LIMITED SUCCESS AND DEFICITS OF SUCH GOD/S IN DEMOCRATIC SURVIVAL WITH EQUITIES FOR ALL AS DESIGNED..ETC” .. DEFENDANT # 1 . DEFENDANT # 2 USA GOVT, WASHINGTON DC ET AL , 300 + DEFENDANTS. gOOD LUCK TO ALL IN FAILING DEMOCRACY IN USA WITH STRUGGLE BY WE THE PEOPLE TO REGENERATE, SOONER THE BETTER. ASSTS TO DR , THE REV KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR A REPUBLIAN CANDIDATE OF NEXT U S PRESIDENT 1008 OR ONWARDS.approved by kamal roy, the re dr, m s (suny maritime college 1974 id #578 80 4399) ph. d. (amaagement) ll. b (law) d. d (religions) 9 from foreign chools, accedited)adv cert in public admn (USDA graduate school, washington dc 1972) author, ordained clergy on vow of poverty, u s american poor, a member of weaker communities in usa of 10 millions strongs (united to claim leadership in usa so far hijacked from such members of we the people in usa pursuat to us consttution, & now in struggle for equal and equitable circumstance to contest for electoral compretition.u s anti trust laws with news as industrial produce are and were used, abused, manipulated by us news media & conglomerates to curb chances of a memb er of underdog communities in usa during current electioneering so cmplaints were filed in different jurisdiction in federal couts kn nd of california at sanfrancisco, district of new jessey, and as on 2.6. 2008 in the us district court for district of new Hampshire at concord, with misc civil rights violations against the kamal k k roy aka j g jr and he has been a fec regd us presidential candidate as a republicanhe was damaged, pained and damaged in democratic jungledemocracy in usa and he as such prayed for injunction a and reliefs to postpone nov 2008 us presidential electoral competition for misc democratic abuses. u s american human_animas' conceive god/s not unfamiar or not recognised god/s of all reigions in usa, usa govt, states of usa, all board of election made a fool of dr roy, as was thecase of fec, poliotical parties, especially beneficiaries of violations were clearly hillary clinton, bobama, john mc cain et also por in all measures except abilities tto run the nation named usa ,is losing chances to win presidency for him, that was thelegal basis for civil rights violations and allegations in court and prayer to postpone presidential election 2008 until ills and deficits are replenished to kamal roy et al, the disadvantaded in u s america the land of inequal oppotunities as alleged Issue by gargi r Lahiri,m a, asst treasurer of campaign committee for dr roy tha plaintiff for all plaintiffs pre se as plaintiffs associations are all unincorporated , & pursuant to 1 st us constitution kamal was able to all assocn and act, & and as clergy on vow of povverty (irs rule ) he may not accept any money except cost if any, not for democratic strategy played in action for the persons of we the people, of damages money claimed 1. 5 trillions of us $ claimed which could be awarded by jury from we thhe people, in each jurisdictions as stated in civil actions separately in pro rata damages claimed lawfully. approve text bycandidate roy, gargi lahiri, Home > Politics & Government > Elections > Your Open Question vishwa d Member since: 17 November 2007 Total points: 0 (Level 1) Your Open QuestionShow me another » NEW SEGREGATION IN u s OF AMERICA: POWERFULS VS POWERELESS, WEAKER PEOPLE , DISADVANTAGED IN USA ET AL; ? REVEREND, KAMAL KARNA KARUNA ROY SID PUBLICLY ON SUPER TUESDAY OF PRIMAMARIES, AT A SRANAC LAKE, NEW YORK TO HIS VOLUNTTEE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANTS IN THE ELECT KAMAL ROY ELECTION COMMITTEE,ON 2.5. 2008, THAT NEWER SEGREGATION PATTERNS IN U S AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, THE SEGREGATION BETWEEN OLD BLACK AMERIC V WHITE USA IS REDUCING SOME RELEVANCE FOR WHITER BLAKS IN USA VIZ oBAMA, A CANDIDATE , BUT STAUCH SEGREGATION IN BETWEEN POORS IN U S AMERICA, HAVE_NOTS IN USA , THE DISADVANTAGED IN USA , SIMILAR GROUPS IN USA IN JEOPARDY OF DEMOCRATIC DEFICITS, SUCH TOTAL POPULATION OF SEGREGATEDU S AMERICAN WAS OVER 10 % OF TOTAL POPULATION OF APPROXIMATELY 300 MILLIONS, VS RICH, ELITES, POWERFULS, BILLIONAIRS ET AL, AS ANOTHER GROUP. ARE EXPANDING MANIFOLDS IN SEGREGATIONS. DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP RIGHTS WERE REDUCED TO ALMOST ZERO IN TRUEST STATISTICS. oBAMA AND HILLARY BELONGED TO SOME WHITER POWERFUL GROUPS . THE REV KAMAL KARNA SAID , NO OBAMA, NO HILLARY AS US PRESIDENT TO BE ELECTED AND A NEW FACE SHOUD BE DRAFTED AS MR/MS CLEAN TO BE CANDIDATES OR REPUBLICAN / DEMOCRATIC PARTIES TO BE ELECTED AT GENERAL ELECTION IN 2008 . IF AND WHEN ELECTIONS SHOULD BE HELD. DR ROY APPLIED IN U S FEDERAL COURTS AT VARIOUS COURT JURISDICTIONS TO POSTPONE THE GENERAL ELECTION OF NOV 2008 FOR ELECTION OF A US PRESIDEDENT IN USA FOR MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS.SEE FOLLOWING :AMENDED COMMENT :THE REVEREND DR KAMAL KARNA ROY AS ON 2.2. 2008 FILED A CIVIL RIGHTS ALLEGATION IN u s DISTRICT COURT FOR NEW JERSEY DISTRICT AT TRENTON N J & futher filed on 2/6/ 2008 in new hampshire distrit us d court for new hampshire jurisdictional violations (for pro_rata damages, which included violator as defendant viz "wikipedia free encyclopedia of st petersburg, florida , usa et al, further david w brooks a user editor of wikipedia was namked as a non hostile defendant to defendant to tell truth of violations, wikipedia chief executive was cited for civilo court contempt violations as the complaint against wikipedia was pending and subjudice, the article on kamal karna roy was deleted, to change records. in fact article was published without intervies with kamal roy , when he or his associates/volunteers wanted to edit the article , wikipedia against their poplicy of publication was discriminatory unlawful way compromise over 55 edits and fijally deleted the original or any reedited article to defame kamal karna roy illegally. This was a conspiratory act, as such chie executive of wikipedial , was prayed to be taken into custody of laws and by order of usdc , new hampshire,nh, usa for civil contempt of the said court as wikipedia was notified by plaintiffs that complaints agaist them were filed lawfully and court order was pending at usdc, concord nh filed as on 2.6.2008, AGAINST ABOUT 300+ DEFENDANTS WHO WERE ENGAGED IN CAUSING PAIN, HARMS AND DEMOCRATIC DAMAGES LIKE PRE DEATH PAINS TO A U S PATRIOT FOR DENIAL OF DEMOCRATIC BENEFITS TO THE REVEREND DR ROY AS HE WAS AN ORDAINED CLERGY ON VOW OR POVERTY, I R S RULE, AND AS SUCH , HE REMAINED POOR MOST OF HIS LIFE, AND HE WAS A U S AMERIAN POOR, AND HE WAS A MEMBER OF WEAKER COMMUNITIES IN USA AND WAS A MEMBER OF MILLIONS OF HAVE_ NOT IN USA, ABOUT 10 % OF TOTAL U S POPULATION OR 300 MILLIONS IN U S.S , AS SUCH DR WAS VIRTUALLY LEFT OUT BY THE U S NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS MEDIA CONGLOMERATES , AS A CANDIDATE OF HIGH OFFICE AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 ELECTORAL COMPETITION & CAMPAIGN, FOR PURPOSE. hE THE RICH, POWERFUL,ELITES IN USA WERE COVERED IN NEWWS AND AGENTS /CANDIDATES OF HAVE_NOTS WERE LEFT OUT AS IF CANDIDATE VIZ DR KAMAL ROY WAS NOT A CONTESTANT. U S GOVT, FEC, WASHINGTON DC DID NOT LET THE NAMES OF CANDIDATES IN THE FIELD ADEOUATELY; tHE STATS IN USA DID NOT GIVE AID LIKE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE TO WEAKER CANDIDATES , SO SUH CANDIDATES FAILED TO GET FOCUSSED AS IF THEY BELONG AS CONTESTANTS. sTATE BOARD FAILED TO NOTIIFY DATES OF PRIMARY ELECTIONS PRPOSED BY THEM , AS LAWS REQUIRED. sIMILARLYHILLARY , OBAMA GOT FREE PUBLICITY VIZ HILLARY'S DAUGHTER CHELSEA CLINTON, HER HUSBAND BILL CLINTON RECEIVED PUBLICITY FREE OF COST TO PROJECT HILLARY WHO WAS TRYING TO GRAB LEADERSHIP AS A FIRST TIME WOMAN TO GET ELETED AS U S PRESIDENT 2008 BUT THE MEDIA FELL SHY TO PROJECT A MEMBER OF THE HAVE_NOTS. aS SUCH ELECTION WAS IN PROGRESS IN INEQUITABLE SITUATION. DR ROY AS SUCH FILED ANOTHER PETITION FOR VIOLATIONS WERE DETECTED IN THE JURISDICTION TO A RELIEF TO POSTPONE U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2009. aN ACTION SIMILAR, WAS EARLER FILED WITH USD COURT, N D OF CALIFORNIA , SAN FRNCISCO DIVN AS VIOLATIONS WERE FOUND IN THE JURISDICTION. AS DR ROY IS A CANDIDATE IN THE JURISDICTION AND USA GOVT WAS COMMON PARTY AS A DEFENDANT, PRORATA CLAIM WAS PERMISSIBLE UNDER CURRENT LAS FOR SOME WHAT VARIOUS DEGEE OF VIOLATIONS IN DIVERSE JURISDICTION, DR ROY IS MBA (M S DEGREE FROM SUNY MARITIME OLLEGE,NEW YORK CITY ,1974,COLLEGE ID 578804399, HE HAD PH, D IN MANAGEMENT, DOCTORATE IN RELIGIONS:HAS LL. B (LAWS) FROM ACCREDITED FOREIGN SCHOOL. hE HAD ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN PUBLIC ADMN , FROM U S D A GRADUATA=E SCHOOL, WASHINGTON DC , 1972; BUT HE WASBEING FOOLED IN DEMOCRATIC ELECTION, THE SAID ELECTION WAS LIKE A DOG_FIGHT ,KAMAL WROTE IN COURT ACTION, WHEREIN SELECTED DOGS OF POWERFUL OWNERS OF THE ANIMALS WERE ALLOWED TO THE FIGHT WITH DIFFERENT DEGREES OF DEMOCRATIC PROIVILEGES. sO DR ROY PRAYED TO POSTPONE NOV 2008 ELCTION, UNTIL COUT DECIDED COURT ACTION AGAINT DEFENDANTS FOR DAMAGES AND KAMAL'S RIGHT TO BE ELECTED AT FUTURE PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST FOR REPLACED AND POSTPPONED NOV 2008 U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ... THE REVEREND MS LISA N R ALSTON, R.N (NURSING,NY STATE, BA HON, M.D (RELIGIOND0 EXECUTIE OFFICER & SECRETATAR & THE REVEREND MS GARGI LAHIRI , ASST. TREASURER, ELECTION COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV Y DR KAMAL ROY ELECTION COMMITTEE 2008 ( APPROVED BY CANDIDATE ROY ON 2. 3 .AS AMENDED COMMENMT, BUT CIVIL COMPLAINTS WAS LEGALLY & DULY FILED WITH THE NOTED COURT ON 2. 2. 2008. REGARDS AND THANKS TO ALL FOR TAKING A DEMOCRATIC EVENT AS IS I JUNGLE DEMOCRATIC CONDITION IN US ELECTION AND CAMPAIGN WHERIN U S ANTI TRUST LAWS PROHIBITING ANY COMPETITION WITH INDUSTRIAL PRODUCES, BUT IN THE DISGUISE OF FREE PRESS THE NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS CONGLOMERATES VIZ THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, USA, CNN USA, THE NEW YORK TIMES, NEW YORK, NEWS CORP OF RUPERT MURDOCH AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE ETC, ET AL AS NAMED AS DEFENDANTS IN THE ACTION AND INCLUDING U S AMERICAN GOD/S OF RELIGIONSAS HUMAN_ANIMALS’ CONCEIVED AND CUSTOM_MADE GOD/S OF ALL RELIGIONS FAILED TO OVERSEE PAINS AND DAMAGES OF DR KAMA K K ROYSUFFERING DENIAL OF EQUITABLE RIGHTS TO CONTEST ELECTION POOR OR RICH, HAVE_NOTS AND ELITES IN USA., ACTION WAS TITLED AND PROPOSED AS “ ASSOCIATION OF COMMITTEE TO ELECT THE REV DR KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR BY KAMAL ROY PRO SE FOR SELF AND FINCIALLY STARVING 120 + UNINCORPORATED LAWFUL ASSOCIATIONS OF USA (DR ROY BY FIRST AMENDMENT OF US CONSTITUTION IS LAWFULLY PERMITTED TO ASSOCIATE AND ACT FOR SELF AND ASSOCIATIONS EVEN BEING A POOR AND MEMBER OF HAVE-NOTS AND DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE IN USA AND FOR PLAINTIFFS V. “ PEOPLE’S ASSOCIATION OF FOLLOWERS OF CONCEPTS THAT HUMAN ANIMALS’ CONCEOIVED GOD/S OF RELIGIONS AND SUCH CUSTOM MADE GOD/S OF DEMOCRATIC ENTITIES, WE THE PEOPLE IN GENERAL RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTSOF SUCH MAN_MADE GOD/S ; THE LIMITED SUCCESS AND DEFICITS OF SUCH GOD/S IN DEMOCRATIC SURVIVAL WITH EQUITIES FOR ALL AS DESIGNED..ETC” .. DEFENDANT # 1 . DEFENDANT # 2 USA GOVT, WASHINGTON DC ET AL , 300 + DEFENDANTS. gOOD LUCK TO ALL IN FAILING DEMOCRACY IN USA WITH STRUGGLE BY WE THE PEOPLE TO REGENERATE, SOONER THE BETTER. ASSTS TO DR , THE REV KAMAL K K ROY AKA J G JR A REPUBLIAN CANDIDATE OF NEXT U S PRESIDENT 1008 OR ONWARDS.THE REV MS GARGI R LAHIRI ASSTTREASURER AND EXECUTIVE ADVISOR TO ELECTION COMMITTEE ELECT THE REVEREND DR KAMAL KARNA KAUNA ROY GUAM BORN CLERGY, A US CITIZEN BY BIRTH PURSUANT TO U S ACT 1978 FOR GUAM BORN PEOPLE LIVING IN MAINLAND,USA ON DATE OF ENACTMENT OF LAW FOR GUAM BORN PEOPLE; dR KAMAL ROY LIVED IN NEW YORK STATE SINCE 1968; CURRENTLY A REPUBLICAN PARTY HOPEFUL AND CANDIDATE IN U S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORAL COMPETITION 2008 : REV LISA N ROY ALSTON, CASUAL PAID EMPLOYEE AND PART TIME VOLUNTEER EXEUTIVE OFFICER I OF THE GROUP/ NURSING ADVISOR OF GROUP TO WING OF THE NON PROFIT TAX EXEMPT BY IRS VIZ HANDICAP INTERESTS INT'L WORLD RELIGIONS GROUP THE GROUP PROMOTING STRATEGY OF POOR CITIZEN, HAVE_NOTS, DISADVANTAGE " MEMBER OF "WE THE PEOPLE " OF USA, DO CLAIM LEADERSHIP IN DEMOCRACY IN USA ET AL FOR THE FIRST TIME IN DEMOCRATIC HISTORY ,PRESENT AND FOR THE FUTURE, AS A POLICY OF NATIONS VIZ USA, ALEADING DEMOCRACY IN WORLD AND A LEADING PIONEER IN DEMOCRATIC WORLD, UNFORTUNATELY HOWEVER, THE COUNTRY IS RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN GLOBEBUT JUNGLE DEMOCRATIC DYSFUNCTIONS ARE DOMINANT FOR 30 MILLION HAVEMUCH_NOTS IN USA OUT OF 300 MILLION TOTAL POPULATION OF U S CITIZENRY:: COORDINATOR LISA N ROYREFORMS INT'L WING OF hii-W R GROUP.ELECTIONEERING IS A DEMOCRATIC PROCESS, THE PROCESS NEED TO BE SUPERVISED BY WE THE PEOPLE:APPROVED BY DR ROY A STRATEGIC AND LAWFUL, FEC REGISTERED CANDIDATE OF ELECTION, US PRESIDENT 2008. DR ROY MOVED TO AT LEAST 3 USDC FOR VARIOUS DISTRICT JURISDICTIONS TO POSTPONE NOV 2008 US PRESIDENTIA ELECTION FOR VARIOUS VIOLATIONS OF LAWS IN CAMPAIGN AND INJUNCTIONS WERE SOUGHT IN COURTS ON USA ET AL INCLUDING WIKIPEDIA ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FLORIDA HOUSED IN ST PETERSBURG FOR CURBING FREE SPEECH AND FREE EXPRESSION OF THE CANDIDATE ROY. THE DEFENDANTS INCLUDED 375+DEFENDANTS WHICH INCLUDED ALL NEWS MEDIA AND NEWS MEDIA CONGOMERATES, U S AMERICAN HUMAN_ANIMALS' CONCEIVED GOD/S OF ALL RELIGIONS IN USA, LATER DEMOCRATIC CONCEPTUAL GOD/S ARE FAILING AND SINCE FAIING FOR DECADES IN USA AND HARMED, PAINED THE PROSE PLAINTIFF DR KAMAL K K ROY AND OTHER PLAINTIFF UNINCORPORATED LAWFUL ASSOCIATIONS.SO DEMOCRACY AND TRUEST EFFORTS TO REGENERATE BENEFITS TO POORER, WEAKER CITIZENS NEED TO BE RESTORED AS PER OPTIMUM, POSSIBLY NEVER EQUAL,, BENEFITS. moreResolved Question: Why has the equal rights amendment not been reintroduced?
It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution? Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/ The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. Also, I'm a male. moreResolved Question: Why has the equal rights amendment not been reintroduced?
It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution? Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/ The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. Also, I'm a male. moreResolved Question: Why has the equal rights amendment not been reintroduced?
It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution? Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/ The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. Also, I'm a male. moreResolved Question: Why has the equal rights amendment not been reintroduced?
It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution? Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/ The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. Also, I'm a male. moreResolved Question: Why has the equal rights amendment not been reintroduced?
It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution? Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/ The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. Also, I'm a male. moreVoting Question: Why has the Equal Rights Amendment not be reintroduced?
It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution? Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/ The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. moreResolved Question: Why has the Equal Rights Amendment not yet been re-introduced?
It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution? Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/ The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. moreResolved Question: Should the Equal Rights Amendment of 1972 be reconsidered?
moreResolved Question: What did the Equal Rights Amendment of 1972 guarantee?
? moreTop 1972 Equal Rights Amendment Links
OverviewThe Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is the name of a proposed amendment to the United States ... Supreme Court declared the entire matter moot, on grounds that the 1972 ERA was ... |
Equal Rights Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaCongress passed the Equal Rights Amendment in 1972, but it set a seven year time limit for ratification. During this time 38 states needed to ratify ... |
4ERAAs supporters of the Equal Rights Amendment between 1972 and 1982 lobbied, marched, rallied, petitioned, picketed, went on hunger strikes, and committed acts of civil ... |
HistoryRes. 10, a new federal Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) (also known as "Women's Equality Amendment") ... Some people now argue that the federal ERA proposed in 1972 can be ... |
"Equal Rights Amendment"The Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution was first proposed in the United States Congress in ... However, it was not until 1972 that a version of ERA was passed by the Senate and ... |
Menu
- Home
- Who Invented The Equal Sign
Equals Viva Bobby Joe
How Many Footsteps Equal A Mile
The Equal Pay Act
Equal Housing Lender
B Equal
Equal Opportunity Women Men
Equal Armed Cross
1 Cup Equals
Equal Rights And Punishment
What Is Equal Made Of - Sitemap
- Privacy Policy
Offers
|
1972 Equal Rights Amendment |
|
Equal Rights |
|
Check Free Online Encyclopedia for information about 1972 Equal Rights Amendment |
|
Online Airtime |
|
Looking for 1972 Equal Rights Amendment Videos? |
Copyright
Equal Site is © 2008 | All Rights Reserved | All trademarks are the exclusive property of their respective owners.